ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
A Generalizable Multimodal Model for Treatment-Stratified Risk and Survival Assessment under Real-World Constraints: A Multi-Center Study of Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating histopathology, genomic, and clinical phenotypes holds promise for improving prognostic patient stratification, including within treatment-defined subgroups, in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, ensuring the availability of all modalities in routine clinical practice remains challenging. Comprehensive molecular profiling is often constrained by cost and turnaround time, leaving histopathology as the most consistently available modality across institutions. In addition, variability in staining protocols, scanning devices, patient demographics, and outcome distributions across centers undermines the generalizability of models trained under controlled conditions with complete inputs. To address these challenges, we developed the Domain-Adaptive Incomplete Multimodal Stratification framework (DAIMS). DAIMS leverages paired histopathology, genomic, and clinical data during training to learn generalizable disease representations and uses histology-derived surrogate latent representations when auxiliary modalities are unavailable, enabling flexible histology-only inference. Trained on TCGA samples and validated on two independent European and East Asian cohorts comprising 842 patients, DAIMS consistently outperformed state-of-the-art methods. Adapted DAIMS improved the C-index by 5.6%-13.9% on F1CRC and 4.1%-9.0% on SURGEN compared with baseline methods. DAIMS improved within-cohort prognostic discrimination and localized prognostically relevant morphological patterns that remained stable across institutions. Our evaluation showed that DAIMS achieved generalizable survival stratification across disease stages, molecular subgroups, and treatment-defined patient groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.