ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Genetically Proxied GIP-GIPR Pathway Perturbation and Fracture Risk.
Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetically Proxied GIP-GIPR Pathway Perturbation and Fracture Risk.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo determine whether genetic proxies for incretin pathway perturbation are associated with fracture risk and bone mineral density, providing human genetic evidence relevant to the skeletal safety of incretin-based therapies. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted drug-target Mendelian randomisation using cis genetic variants near GIP, GIPR, GCG, GLP1R in 401 983 unrelated UK Biobank participants. Instruments were scaled to 1 kg/m
resultsGIP-GIPR perturbation was associated with lower odds of fractures at major osteoporotic sites when scaled to lower BMI (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.98) or lower HbA1c. Associations were similar for combined spine-and-hip fractures under both scaling approaches (OR 0.68, 0.49-0.94). Genome-wide liability to lower BMI or HbA1c did not show the same fracture associations as GIP-GIPR perturbation. GCG-GLP1R estimates were imprecise. Genetically proxied incretin pathway perturbation was not associated with eBMD. In Cox analyses, GIP-GIPR genetic risk score was associated with lower risk of fractures at major osteoporotic sites (HR 0.976, 0.959-0.992) and combined spine-and-hip fractures (HR 0.971, 0.946-0.996).
conclusionsHuman genetic evidence suggests an association between genetically proxied GIP-GIPR pathway perturbation and lower fracture risk, supporting fracture-focused evaluation of GIPR-targeting therapies in clinical and post-marketing studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.