ReviewBiomarker research2026
Megakaryocytes in myelofibrosis: mechanisms of fibrotic niche remodeling and therapeutic implications.
Review in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myelofibrosis is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by progressive remodeling of the bone marrow microenvironment. Megakaryocyte (MK) abnormalities are defining histological features of prefibrotic and overt primary myelofibrosis and contribute to disease pathogenesis. Dysplastic MKs can directly modify the pericellular extracellular matrix (ECM), but their main fibrogenic influence comes from coordinating stromal, immune, and endothelial responses. This Review synthesizes evidence linking abnormal MK biology to fibrotic progression and examines its implications for biomarkers and therapy. In normal bone marrow, MKs regulate hematopoietic stem cell quiescence, organize the ECM and vascular niches, and participate in immune regulation. Hematopoiesis driven by mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL, together with chronic inflammation, disrupts these functions. Dysplastic MKs release or activate transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), platelet factor 4 (PF4/CXCL4), and other profibrotic mediators and interact with neutrophils, monocytes, mesenchymal stromal cells, and endothelial cells. These interactions promote stromal activation, monocyte-to-fibrocyte differentiation, vascular and osteogenic remodeling, and ECM accumulation. As disease progresses, collagen cross-linking and altered bone marrow mechanics help stabilize the remodeled niche. Janus kinase inhibitors reduce splenomegaly and symptoms, but pharmacological therapies have not been shown to consistently reverse established bone marrow fibrosis. Durable disease modification will likely require sustained suppression of mutant progenitors and dysplastic MK production together with inhibition of stromal activation, inflammatory signaling, and matrix deposition or cross-linking. Clinical improvement, suppression of abnormal megakaryopoiesis, reduction in profibrotic signaling, and regression of bone marrow fibrosis should therefore be assessed separately using measures matched to each therapeutic mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.