Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42811375›Full record

ReviewBiomarker research2026

Megakaryocytes in myelofibrosis: mechanisms of fibrotic niche remodeling and therapeutic implications.

Jiansong Huang, Xiaoyue Yin, Xiaofeng Shi, Xiudi Yang, Rumeng Li, Xiang Zhang, Yi Zhang, Hongyan Tong, Jie Jin, Jian Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiansong Huang *Department of Hematology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Malignancies, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, China.
Xiaoyue Yin *Department of Hematology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Malignancies, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, China.
Xiaofeng Shi *Department of Hematology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210003, China.
Xiudi YangDepartment of Hematology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Malignancies, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, China.
Rumeng LiDepartment of Hematology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Malignancies, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, China.
Xiang ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Malignancies, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Malignancies, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, China.
Hongyan TongDepartment of Hematology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Malignancies, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, China.
Jie JinDepartment of Hematology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Malignancies, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, China. jiej0503@zju.edu.cn.
Jian HuangDepartment of Hematology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Malignancies, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310003, China. househuang@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070118the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82570191the Young Scientists Project of the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2025YFC3511400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelofibrosis is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by progressive remodeling of the bone marrow microenvironment. Megakaryocyte (MK) abnormalities are defining histological features of prefibrotic and overt primary myelofibrosis and contribute to disease pathogenesis. Dysplastic MKs can directly modify the pericellular extracellular matrix (ECM), but their main fibrogenic influence comes from coordinating stromal, immune, and endothelial responses. This Review synthesizes evidence linking abnormal MK biology to fibrotic progression and examines its implications for biomarkers and therapy. In normal bone marrow, MKs regulate hematopoietic stem cell quiescence, organize the ECM and vascular niches, and participate in immune regulation. Hematopoiesis driven by mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL, together with chronic inflammation, disrupts these functions. Dysplastic MKs release or activate transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), platelet factor 4 (PF4/CXCL4), and other profibrotic mediators and interact with neutrophils, monocytes, mesenchymal stromal cells, and endothelial cells. These interactions promote stromal activation, monocyte-to-fibrocyte differentiation, vascular and osteogenic remodeling, and ECM accumulation. As disease progresses, collagen cross-linking and altered bone marrow mechanics help stabilize the remodeled niche. Janus kinase inhibitors reduce splenomegaly and symptoms, but pharmacological therapies have not been shown to consistently reverse established bone marrow fibrosis. Durable disease modification will likely require sustained suppression of mutant progenitors and dysplastic MK production together with inhibition of stromal activation, inflammatory signaling, and matrix deposition or cross-linking. Clinical improvement, suppression of abnormal megakaryopoiesis, reduction in profibrotic signaling, and regression of bone marrow fibrosis should therefore be assessed separately using measures matched to each therapeutic mechanism.

Indexed as

Bone marrow microenvironmentFibrotic nicheMegakaryocytesMegakaryopoiesisMyelofibrosis

Identifiers

PMID42811375
PMCPMC13625257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.