ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
Creating shared vision in patient partnered research: a case example of patient engagement from the PAVE project (producing an arthritis value framework with economic evidence: paving the way for rare childhood disease).
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo align with good practices in patient-oriented research, academic researchers who are involving patients in research must understand what values are important to patients, what motivates involvement in research and what patients hope to achieve by partnering in research. In this commentary, we add to the literature on creating a shared understanding with patient partners by describing our approach to co-creating a shared vision in a patient-partnered research project as a case example of patient and public involvement in research. A CASE EXAMPLE: This example is embedded within the Producing an Arthritis Value Framework with Economic Evidence: Paving the Way for Rare Childhood Diseases (PAVE) project, where we co-created a value framework with patients and parents to capture the ways that childhood arthritis affects families. We partnered with Cassie + Friends to identify and select patients and parents from across Canada who were interested in joining the project as research partners. The research partners included seven young adults and eight parents of children with childhood arthritis. At the outset of the project, we conducted a patient-engagement process with the patient and parent research partners to create shared vision, whereby we sought to understand: (1) the "why" for partnering, and (2) the values they wanted to guide the research partnership. Through this process, we jointly identified the patient and parent research partners' motivations, which spanned five related categories: building knowledge and awareness, making a positive difference, community building, advocacy, and personal growth. We also co-created guiding values for our collaborative work, which included openness, safety, solidarity, support, empathy and respect for different journeys.
conclusionsThis shared vision sets the stage for meaningful engagement: guiding values inform interactions while understanding motivations enhances and enriches the research. We have provided a case example of how we co-created a vision and set our project team up for meaningful engagement. This process has allowed us to develop strong, trusting and ongoing relationships between researchers and the research partners and provides an example that other researchers can adopt and adapt in their settings to co-create shared vision for their patient partnered projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.