Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42811357›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2026

The gap between having and using: socioeconomic inequalities in long-lasting insecticidal net coverage among children and adolescents in rural Guinea.

Almamy Amara Toure, Sidikiba Sidibe, Soledad Colombe, Aboubacar Sidiki Magassouba, Antea Paviotti, Katharina Kreppel, Emmanuel Bottieau, Mohamed Prince Kaba, Abdoul Habib Beavogui, Alexandre Delamou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Almamy Amara ToureInstitut Africain de Santé Publique of the University Saint Thomas D'Aquin, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. almamy@maferinyah.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-5667
Sidikiba Sidibe *Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Techniques, Gamal Abdel Nasser University, Conakry, Guinea.
Soledad Colombe *Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Aboubacar Sidiki MagassoubaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Techniques, Gamal Abdel Nasser University, Conakry, Guinea.
Antea PaviottiDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Katharina KreppelDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Emmanuel BottieauDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Mohamed Prince KabaNational Institute of Public Health, Coyah, Guinea.
Abdoul Habib BeavoguiCentre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Mafèrinyah, Forécariah, Guinea.
Alexandre DelamouDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Techniques, Gamal Abdel Nasser University, Conakry, Guinea.
Seni KouandaInstitut Africain de Santé Publique of the University Saint Thomas D'Aquin, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria is a major health issue in sub-Saharan Africa, including Guinea, affecting children under five and rural populations, with a prevalence of up to 30% in some areas. Although long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are effective, inequalities in access and use persist across wealth, geography, and age groups; however, detailed data are limited. This study assessed socioeconomic inequalities in LLIN access and use among children and adolescents.

methodsWe analysed data from a cohort study conducted between March 2022 and February 2023 in Maferinyah, rural Guinea, with monthly visits to households of children and adolescents aged 1-19. Socioeconomic position (SEP) was derived using an asset index and categorised into terciles. LLIN access and use-given-access were analysed using mixed logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic and seasonal factors. Socioeconomic inequalities were quantified using concentration and Erreygers indices with cluster bootstrap confidence intervals. Pathway and decomposition analyses assessed the contribution of access to LLIN to inequalities in effective LLIN use (defined as use regardless of access).

resultsThe odds of LLIN access were higher among middle-SEP (aOR = 3.84; 95% CI 1.31-11.96) and high-SEP households (aOR = 3.76; 95% CI 1.18-12.71) than among low-SEP households. Inequalities in effective LLIN use were driven by disparities in access rather than by use behaviour. Although LLIN use among those with access exceeded 80% across all socioeconomic groups, effective use in the overall study population was lower among low-SEP households (29.6%). Significant pro-rich socioeconomic inequalities were observed for both LLIN use (Erreygers index (EI) = 0.386; 95% CI 0.151-0.594) and access (EI = 0.412; 95% CI 0.168-0.636). Decomposition analysis suggested that socioeconomic inequality in effective LLIN use was almost entirely explained by differences in access (98.8% of the total variance).

conclusionsMalaria prevention in rural Guinea is unequal, leaving poorer children and adolescents less protected than wealthier ones. This gap stems from unequal access to LLINs rather than differences in net use among households with nets. The study showed that the poorest families did not have access to nets in the first place. Addressing this inequity requires improved distribution strategies targeting the poorest and most vulnerable households, rather than behavioural interventions for net use only.

Indexed as

Children and adolescentsEquityInequalityLong Lasting Insecticide Treated Nets (LLINs)MalariaRural Guinea

Identifiers

PMID42811357
PMCPMC13621685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.