Observational studyBMC health services research2026
Implementation and feasibility evaluation of a standard set of intensive care unit discharge criteria in a prospective before-after observational pilot study.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying ICU patients stable enough for discharge to lower care levels is usually subjective. We previously derived a standardized discharge criteria set including patient-specific aspects and organizational capabilities. This study evaluated its implementation feasibility, clinical utility for objective discharge readiness assessment, and descriptive patient flow and safety related outcome parameters in routine care.
methodsA prospective two-phase before-after observational pilot study was conducted in two German ICUs in 2022. During baseline, discharge-readiness workflows were observed. After criteria-set implementation and pre-testing, criteria completion, user feedback, patient-flow, acuity, and capacity parameters were collected. Due to small cohorts, only descriptive statistics were reported.
resultsEleven mainly patient-specific and some organization-specific criteria reached > 80% completion at discharge decision and were defined as a core set. User feedback supported extending this core set with organization-related criteria according to clinical setting, patient groups, pathways, and receiving-unit capabilities. Discharge readiness assessment should involve all relevant stakeholders to align care needs with available capabilities.
conclusionsA core set of eleven criteria indicated ICU discharge readiness in clinical routine. Organization-specific criteria can support adaptation to different patient subgroups and pathways. Workflow integration may support timely and safe transfers, but patient flow and safety effects require validation in larger studies. Holistic discharge readiness assessment requires coordinated pathway-management processes along the care continuum. Future implementation should prioritize reporting automation, intuitive visualization, and workflow-integrated documentation, ideally supported by a patient data management system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.