Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42811348›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Between support and uncertainty: employers' perspectives on workplace inclusion of people with mental health problems.

Silvia Krumm, Lea Mayer, Sarah Feige, Nicole Stasch, Lena Renz, Christiane Braun-Volkert, Reinhold Kilian, Edith Almer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Silvia KrummDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. silvia.krumm@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Lea MayerDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Sarah FeigeClinic and Policlinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Nicole StaschDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Lena RenzDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Christiane Braun-VolkertMutMacherMenschen e.V., Augsburg, Germany.
Reinhold KilianDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Edith AlmerMutMacherMenschen e.V., Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs / Research Network on Interdisciplinary Social Policy Research (FIS) FIS.03.00003.21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing awareness of mental health in the workplace, people with mental health problems continue to face substantial barriers to labour market participation. While stigma-related explanations have been widely addressed, less is known about how employers respond to mental health problems within the constraints of everyday organisational practice. This study explores employers' perspectives on workplace inclusion, with a particular focus on ambivalences, facilitating orientations, and expectations towards employees with mental health problems.

methodsThis study reports findings from the first, qualitative phase of a participatory mixed-methods research project conducted in Southern Germany. Between November 2022 and August 2023, we conducted 29 semi-structured interviews with employers from companies across different sectors. Data were analysed using structured qualitative content analysis.

resultsEmployers described ambivalent orientations towards the inclusion of people with mental health problems. While mental health issues were seen as increasingly normalised and framed within broader societal developments, employers reported uncertainties regarding work organisation, team functioning, and predictability. Facilitating orientations included social responsibility, recognition of the health-promoting role of employment, pragmatic responses to labour shortages, and positive prior experiences. At the same time, workplace participation was often described as depending on employees' transparency regarding work-related limitations, individual responsibility for managing mental health, and disclosure as a prerequisite for employers' support and mutual trust. DISCUSSION: Workplace inclusion of people with mental health problems appears to depend not only on employers' attitudes but also on practical considerations related to work organization and team functioning. Employers' perspectives reflected ambivalence, balancing commitments to participation with concerns about predictability, fairness, and collective functioning. Expectations regarding disclosure, responsibility, and transparency were central to perceived feasibility of support.

conclusionsAddressing these organisational dynamics may help inform more context-sensitive strategies to promote sustainable labour market participation.

Indexed as

EmploymentMental DisordersSocial InclusionWorkplaceAdultFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaUncertaintyWorking ConditionsDisclosureEmployersLabour market participationMental disordersQualitative researchStigmaWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID42811348
PMCPMC13621519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.