Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42811338›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2026

In-hospital peer-supported human milk bank management model and its association with human milk feeding proportions and clinical outcomes in extremely preterm infants: a recipient-to-voluntary-donor approach.

Xinxin Song, Aifen Cao, Yubing Dong, Qingling Yu, Xueyu Chen, Xiaoyun Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinxin Song *College of Nursing, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Jinzhong, 030619, China.
Aifen Cao *Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Women and Children's Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Yubing DongCollege of Nursing, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Jinzhong, 030619, China.
Qingling YuGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xueyu ChenShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Women and Children's Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China. snowvsrain@smu.edu.cn.
Xiaoyun XiongCollege of Nursing, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Jinzhong, 030619, China. xxyun@smu.edu.cn.

Funding

Maternal and Child Health Research Project (Maternal and Infant Nutrition and Health Special Program) of the National Center for Women and Children's Health, National Health Commission (2025FYH21)Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (No. SZSM202211001)Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JCYJ20230807120213026)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman milk feeding proportions among preterm infants remain unsatisfactory, and donor human milk is recommended as the best alternative when mother's own milk is insufficient. Although established human milk banks provide essential donor human milk services, some settings may face challenges related to donor continuity and the timely alignment of donor milk supply with recipient demand. We therefore developed an in-hospital peer-supported human milk bank management model featuring a structured recipient-to-voluntary-donor pathway within the same neonatal unit.

methodsThis peer-supported model was implemented at Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital in January 2024. In this retrospective analysis, extremely preterm infants admitted from January to December 2023 served as the control group and received the usual feeding practice, with mother's own milk supplemented by preterm formula when insufficient. Infants admitted from January to December 2024 comprised the human milk bank group and received donor human milk from the in-hospital peer-supported bank when maternal milk was insufficient. Clinical outcomes including human milk feeding proportions, necrotizing enterocolitis, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were compared between the two groups to examine the associations between implementation of the model and human milk feeding proportions and clinical outcomes.

resultsHuman milk feeding proportions were significantly higher in the human milk bank group than in the control group during the first 7 days of life (100% vs. 49%, P < 0.001) and during the first 28 days of life (100% vs. 98%, P < 0.001). Total enteral intake volume was significantly higher in the human milk bank group than in the control group during the first 7 days of life (44.5 mL vs. 38.5 mL, P = 0.002), and during the first 28 days of life (1377.8 mL vs. 1079.0 mL, P < 0.001). The incidence of moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia was significantly lower in the human milk bank group (OR = 0.533, 95% CI 0.291-0.978, P = 0.042), whereas the adjusted association with stage II or above necrotizing enterocolitis was not statistically significant (OR = 0.226, 95% CI 0.042-1.224, P = 0.084).

conclusionsThe in-hospital peer-supported human milk bank model was significantly associated with higher human milk feeding proportions during the first 7 days of life and during the first 28 days of life, as well as lower odds of moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants. This model may represent a simple, peer-supported, and potentially scalable strategy for optimizing human milk feeding support in neonatal intensive care units.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely PrematureMilk BanksMilk, HumanFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePeer GroupRetrospective StudiesClinical outcomesDonor human milkExtremely preterm infantsHuman milk bankHuman milk feeding

Identifiers

PMID42811338
PMCPMC13625302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.