ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2026
Targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts: therapeutic strategies, translational challenges, and future perspectives.
Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) act as key drivers of cancer progression and therapeutic resistance within the tumor microenvironment, but their diverse and context-dependent functions complicate therapeutic targeting. The limited clinical efficacy of CAF-targeting therapeutics has prompted a critical reassessment of CAF biology, therapeutic development, and emerging CAF-directed strategies. Unlike prior reviews that predominantly focused on CAF heterogeneity or isolated therapeutic modalities, this review systematically compares pharmacological and biologic CAF-targeting therapeutics, multifunctional nanomedicines, and biologically inspired and living platforms in terms of their underlying mechanisms of action and translational bottlenecks. Drawing on clinical evidence from CAF-targeting therapeutics, we identify several interconnected barriers to successful translation, including CAF heterogeneity and plasticity, patient-selection and biomarker limitations, preclinical-clinical mismatch and combination-treatment dependency, insufficient tumor penetration and systemic toxicity, and signaling redundancy and pathway compensation. Importantly, lessons from unsuccessful clinical trials are used to critically reassess whether current CAF-targeting nanomedicines and platforms adequately address these barriers. In parallel, we evaluate platform-specific translational challenges, particularly those related to biosafety and manufacturing feasibility. These analyses highlight the persistent gaps between the evolving understanding of CAF functional states, existing design rationales for nanomedicine and platforms, and real-world clinical practice. Future directions should therefore prioritize the identification of functionally defined CAF states, the optimization of clinically relevant models of advanced disease, and the development of therapeutic platforms tailored to clearly defined clinical needs. Finally, we propose an iterative translational roadmap and a hypothesis-generating sequential cancer cell/CAF dual-targeting framework to guide the development of clinically translatable CAF-directed therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.