ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Retrospective case-control study of haematological indices and inflammatory ratios in the diagnosis of paediatric brucellosis.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrucellosis is a common zoonotic infection in Turkey and other Mediterranean countries. In children, symptoms are usually non-specific, including fever, fatigue, arthralgia, and myalgia, which may complicate diagnosis. Haematological indices and inflammatory ratios have recently been studied as possible supportive markers in infectious diseases, but findings in brucellosis remain inconsistent. This study investigated red cell distribution width (RDW), plateletcrit (PCT), platelet indices, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in paediatric brucellosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective case-control study included 42 children with brucellosis and 39 healthy controls. Patients were followed at Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital between September 2018 and February 2019. Diagnosis was based on compatible clinical findings together with a standard tube agglutination (Wright) titer ≥ 1:160, a positive Brucella Coombs test, or isolation of Brucella spp. from blood culture. Complete blood count parameters were measured using a Sysmex XN-series haematology analyser with a DI-60 morphology modüle. Statistical analyses included the t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied for multiple comparisons. ROC curve analysis and age- and sex-adjusted binary logistic regression were also performed.
resultsThirty patients were male and 12 were female. The median age was 14 years (range 6-17). The most common symptoms were arthralgia (85.7%), weakness (71.4%), and fever (66.7%). RDW, platelet count, and PCT differed significantly between groups in unadjusted analysis, but these differences lost significance after correction for multiple testing (all FDR-adjusted p > 0.18). ROC analysis showed low diagnostic performance overall. RDW demonstrated high specificity (92.3%) but low sensitivity (46.3%). After adjustment for age and sex, only RDW remained independently associated with brucellosis (adjusted OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.30-4.11, p = 0.005). Other haematological indices and inflammatory ratios were not significantly different.
conclusionOnly RDW remained significantly associated with brucellosis after adjustment for age and sex. RDW may provide supportive information together with clinical and serological findings, although larger studies are needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.