ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2026
Navigating Surfactant Selection in In Vitro Dissolution Testing: Mechanistic Insights and Practical Strategies.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro dissolution testing is central to pharmaceutical development, yet it is increasingly challenged by poorly soluble drugs, which account for over 40% of marketed products and up to 90% of new chemical entities, for which dissolution often limits absorption. Surfactants are widely incorporated into dissolution media to achieve sink conditions and improve the discriminatory powder of dissolution methods, but inappropriate surfactant selection or concentration can alter drug release mechanisms, mask formulation differences, and reduce biopredictive performance. This review examines the mechanisms of surfactant action, including wetting enhancement, micellar solubilization, and drug-surfactant interactions, together with the physicochemical properties of anionic, cationic, non-ionic, and zwitterionic surfactant relevant to dissolution testing. Building on these principles, we discuss practical considerations for surfactant selection, concentration optimization, analytical compatibility, surfactant quality and source variability, formulation-specific considerations for enabled drug delivery systems, integration with physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling, and evolving regulatory expectations. Together, these provide a practical framework for developing robust, reproducible, and discriminating dissolution methods that better reflect in vivo performance and support decision-making across drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42811231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.