ArticleLearning & behavior2026
Effects of reward magnitude on rats' long-term spatial memory retention in the radial-arm maze.
Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our study examined whether reward magnitude affects long-term spatial memory retention in rats performing a radial-arm maze task. Previous studies, using a forced-choice learning phase followed by a free-choice test, have reported retention of up to 72 hours, but they typically used a large reward (10 pellets per arm; 45 mg each) rather than the standard reward (one pellet per arm), leaving open a reward-based explanation. In Experiment 1, we conducted a between-subjects comparison of two reward conditions: a standard-reward group (one pellet per arm) and a large-reward group (10 pellets per arm). The delay interval was progressively extended from 1 min to 1 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, and 72 hr. Both groups performed significantly above chance at all delays, including 72 hr, and performance did not differ significantly between reward conditions. In Experiment 2, we tested whether relative changes in reward magnitude modulate retention. Within each reward group, reward magnitude was increased or decreased for only one arm during the learning phase, followed by a 24-hr retention test. Accuracy for the arm with the changed reward did not differ significantly from that of the unchanged arms. Together, these findings show that 72-hr retention can be obtained, even with the standard small reward (one pellet), and that radial-arm maze performance is robust to both absolute reward magnitude and relative changes in reward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42811192What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.