ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Robotic-assisted fixation with cortical bone trajectory versus conventional pedicle trajectory for short-segment lumbar decompression and fusion surgery: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted fixation with cortical bone trajectory (RAF-CBT) versus conventional pedicle trajectory (RAF-CPT) in short-segment lumbar decompression and fusion.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study. Patients undergoing short-segment decompression and fusion with robotic-assisted fixation for degenerative stenosis were assigned to RAF-CBT or RAF-CPT groups. The primary outcome was the change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, perioperative measures, radiographic results, and complications. Subgroup analyses focused on overweight/obese and osteoporotic patients.
resultsAfter matching 82 pairs (n = 164), the RAF-CBT group showed a statistically significant but modest early improvement in ODI score at 1 month (difference, -3.66; 95% CI, -6.32 to -1.00; P = 0.0073), JOA score (difference, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.66; P = 0.0042) at 1 month and back pain VAS score (difference, -0.67; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.16; P = 0.0107) at 1 week. Responder analysis showed significantly higher proportions of patients achieving MCID for ODI at 1 month (82.93% vs. 67.07%, P = 0.0191) and VAS back pain at 1 week (81.71% vs. 67.07%, P = 0.0318) in the RAF-CBT group. RAF-CBT was also associated with more favorable perioperative measures (incision length, operative time, blood loss, drainage, and hospital stay; all P < 0.0001). Radiographic outcomes and complication rates were similar. In the overweight/obese subgroup (n = 46 pairs), RAF-CBT showed more pronounced early benefits, with significantly greater ODI improvement at 1 month (difference, -4.04; 95% CI, -7.88 to -0.21; P = 0.0390) and back pain reduction at 1 week (difference, -0.91; 95% CI, -1.67 to -0.16; P = 0.0184). In the osteoporosis subgroup (n = 47 pairs), the rate of patients with ≥ 1 loosened screw was 14.89% in the RAF-CBT group versus 29.79% in the RAF-CPT group (P = 0.0830), with a GEE-adjusted OR of 0.45 (95% CI 0.18-1.12, P = 0.0860).
conclusionsIn this propensity score-matched retrospective cohort, RAF-CBT showed favorable perioperative metrics and modest, statistically detectable early differences in patient-reported outcomes compared with RAF-CPT, while maintaining similar radiographic and 1-year outcomes. It was associated with specific advantages for overweight/obese and osteoporotic patients, suggesting its potential as a personalized surgical option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42811140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.