ArticleCellular & molecular immunology2026
CAR signaling instructs divergent metabolic reprogramming and functional fates in αβ and γδ T cells.
Article in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
γδ T-cell-based immunotherapies have become relevant as alternatives to conventional αβ T-cell products, with preclinical data demonstrating tumor burden reduction and the mitigation of tumor-induced tissue damage. Given that most CAR constructs have been optimized for αβ T cells, we hypothesized that distinct T-cell types may require tailored CAR architectures to achieve optimal function. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic comparative analysis of γδ and αβ T cells transduced with a second-generation PSCA-targeting CAR (PSCA-8t28z). We found that although γδ and αβ CAR-T cells exhibit comparable levels of cytotoxicity, they differ phenotypically. Through a system-level phosphoproteomic analysis, we identified 307 phosphosites whose abundance differed between γδ and αβ CAR-T cells. Pathway enrichment analysis placed glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and TCR signaling within the top significantly overrepresented signaling networks. The results of functional validation studies confirmed that γδ CAR-T cells have lower glycolytic and oxidative phosphorylation capacity than αβ-CAR-T cells do and weaker activation of activator protein 1 (AP-1). Notably, we identified thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) as a potential actionable target to enhance γδ CAR-T-cell metabolism. Finally, we designed a new synthetic costimulatory receptor that potentiates AP-1 activation, resulting in improved in vivo persistence. These results highlight the fundamental biological differences between γδ and αβ T cells and support the development of cell type-specific receptor engineering strategies to maximize γδ CAR-T-cell function and therapeutic benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42811126What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.