ArticleNature neuroscience2026
A neural architecture for imagined and overt speech motor dynamics.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental imagery is a hallmark of human cognition, yet its neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. Speech imagery (the internal simulation of speech without overt articulation) has been proposed to partially share substrates with speech production, but its spatiotemporal dynamics remain controversial. Here, we leveraged high-resolution electrocorticography to investigate shared and modality-specific coding of articulatory kinematic trajectories during speech imagery and articulation. Linear modeling revealed robust articulatory kinematic trajectories encoding in frontoparietal cortex across modalities. Supramodal populations across middle premotor, subcentral and postcentral-supramarginal regions exhibited spatiotemporal stability during integrative planning. In contrast, modality-specific populations for speech imagery and articulation were somatotopically interleaved in primary sensorimotor cortex, revealing a distinct spatiotemporal organization. We further developed a generalized decoding framework that achieved high prediction accuracy for speech imagery (median 80.4%; chance 16.7%), comparable to speech articulation (78.3%). These findings uncover a somato-cognitive organization linking supramodal planning with modality-specific representations, informing imagery-based brain-computer interfaces.
Identifiers
42811118What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.