ArticleJournal of human genetics2026
Uptake of cascade testing and the factors affecting its implementation among patients in Japan with Lynch syndrome.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the clinical management of hereditary cancer syndromes, risk assessment is needed not only for affected patients but also for their blood relatives. In the families of Lynch syndrome (LS) patients, cascade testing is performed to identify those who carry germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) of mismatch repair genes and to enable the clinical surveillance of cancer-prone organs in relatives with GPVs. To date, the uptake of cascade testing has not been fully reported, and only a limited number of studies have analyzed barriers to its implementation. This retrospective study analyzed the uptake of cascade testing in relatives of Japanese LS probands and clarified factors that promote it. The study included 56 LS probands and 162 first-degree relatives (FDRs). Clinicodemographic data were collected from medical records, and univariate and multivariate analyses compared those who did and did not undergo cascade testing. Fifty-two (32.1%) FDRs of LS probands underwent cascade testing. Independent predictors of cascade testing uptake were the attendance of a family member at the proband's genetic counseling session (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6), female sex of the proband (OR: 2.9), and female sex (OR: 2.2). The cascade testing uptake in this study was comparable to or lower than rates reported in other countries. Encouraging family members to attend genetic counseling with the proband may improve cascade testing uptake in LS families. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the reasons for accepting or declining cascade testing, including an evaluation of intrafamilial communication processes.
Identifiers
42811054What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.