ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Fundamental kinematic indicators predict surgical expertise and clinical outcomes in robot-assisted surgery.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global proliferation of robotic surgical platforms necessitates a framework for objective skill assessment using fundamental kinematic features that are theoretically extractable from any robotic system with 3D position tracking. Here, we demonstrated that fundamental three-dimensional movement patterns alone can accurately distinguish surgical expertise and show associations with clinical outcomes. A Random Forest classifier discriminated expertise with high case-wise accuracy (area under the curve 0.892 ± 0.075), and feature-importance analysis identified left-hand peak density as the principal discriminator. A small set of these fundamental indicators generalized to unseen surgeons in leave-one-surgeon-out validation, localizing the expertise-associated signal to a few interpretable kinematic measures. Kinematic patterns were correlated with clinical outcomes, and exploratory analysis revealed associations between movement features and blood loss. Individual learning curve analysis revealed heterogeneous adaptation patterns among experts transitioning to the new platform and identified distinct phenotypes with implications for personalized training. These findings show that fundamental kinematic analysis using only three-dimensional positional data can provide interpretable indicators of surgical performance that may extend across robotic systems providing coordinate data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.