Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42810814›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2026

From research

Anoop C Choolayil, Vijesh Sreedhar Kuttiatt, Manju Rahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anoop C ChoolayilUnit of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, ICMR - National Institute for Vector Control Research, Puducherry, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2561-2970
Vijesh Sreedhar KuttiattUnit of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, ICMR - National Institute for Vector Control Research, Puducherry, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8435-218X
Manju RahiICMR - National Institute for Vector Control Research, Puducherry, India drmanjurahi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0932-0935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health research often relies on top-down approaches that do not adequately address local needs or engage end-users as active participants. This article narrates the implementation of a bottom-up health research approach at the Model Rural Health Research Unit (MRHRU) in Puducherry, India, aimed at prioritising community participation in health research. The model leverages a participatory approach to integrate local stakeholders into the research process. The study outlines a structured, democratic process for stakeholder engagement, beginning with the identification and network-building of stakeholders and progressing through collaborative brainstorming, priority setting and project development. By aligning research initiatives with these 'felt needs', the MRHRU facilitates relevant and impactful health interventions. This approach, while grounded in the local context, provides a model for setting health priorities based on community perceptions, adaptable to other regions and settings, underscoring the benefits of participatory health research in eliminating health disparities and achieving health equity.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity ParticipationHealth Services ResearchRural HealthHealth PrioritiesHumansIndiaHealth policyHealth services researchPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID42810814
PMCPMC13629886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.