Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42810789›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Understanding the impact of perineal reconstruction after extended margin cancer surgery on longer-term quality of life, morbidity and health economic outcomes: protocol for the UK REMACS observational cohort study.

Malcolm A West, Kashuf Khan, Charles T West, Zoe Li, Elias Brown, Samantha Sodergren, Helen Moyses, Sam A Rose, Errol Bignall, Layla Stephen and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05219058 (REMACS - Understanding the Impact of Perineal Reconstruction After Extended MArgin Cancer Surgery on Longer-term Quality of Life, Morbidity and Health Economic Outcomes - a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05219058 recruitingnot on this map

REMACS - Understanding the Impact of Perineal Reconstruction After Extended MArgin Cancer Surgery on Longer-term Quality of Life, Morbidity and Health Economic Outcomes - a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustRan2022 to 2028Enrolled236ConditionsSurgery--Complications, Pelvic Cancer, Abdominal Cancer, Quality of LifeArmsBiological mesh reconstruction, Myocutaneous flap reconstruction, Primary closure reconstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Malcolm A WestCancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK m.west@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-5356
Kashuf KhanCancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Charles T WestCancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-0065
Zoe LiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Swansea, Swansea, UK.
Elias BrownNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9368-7362
Samantha SodergrenCentre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8755-146X
Helen MoysesNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Sam A RoseBowel Research UK, London, UK.
Errol BignallCommunities First charity, London, UK.
Layla StephenPLANETS Cancer Charity, Southampton, UK.
Sharon A ApplinNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Keith CooperSouthampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0318-7670
Inês Souto RiberioSouthampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Lynn CalmanCentre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9964-6017
Alex H MirnezamiCancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdvanced and recurrent pelvic cancers pose significant public health challenges due to their invasive nature, affecting pelvic structures like the pelvic floor, other organs and the perineum. Treatment involves chemoradiotherapy followed by extended margin cancer surgery (EMCS) to achieve cancer cure. EMCS results in an empty pelvis prone to major complications like collections, abscesses, bowel obstruction, fistulae and perineal wound breakdown. Known as the empty pelvis syndrome (EPS), this affects >50% of patients. EPS leads to poor quality of life (QoL), reduced return to function and significant financial burden to patients and healthcare services. Perineal reconstruction using myocutaneous flaps or biological meshes may mitigate these complications, but their longer-term clinical outcomes and effectiveness are not well-documented. This study addresses key unmet needs and aligns with strategic healthcare priorities.The Reconstruction after Extended Margin Cancer Surgery (REMACS) study aims to assess the effects of EMCS and perineal reconstruction on QoL, complications and health economic utilisation up to 12 months post-surgery.Objectives include:a. Providing real-world data on 12-month QoL and complications to aid shared decision-making consultations regarding reconstructive techniques post-ECMS.b. Informing clinical practice and patient expectations, improving communication and reducing regret throughout the initial stages of cancer survivorship.c. Evaluating economic impacts on patients and healthcare settings, optimising resource utilisation.d. Uncovering hidden treatment toxicities post-ECMS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Design: Multi-centre observational cohort study.

participants236 patients undergoing EMCS with perineal reconstruction in tertiary cancer centres, ensuring diverse representation. DATA COLLECTION: Patients will complete QoL (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30), EuroQol-5 Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer-QoL (LRRC-QoL)) and Decision-Regret questionnaires pre-surgery and 3, 6, 12 months post-surgery. Patient economic impact (COST, patient employment, health resource utilisation), quality-adjusted life years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (EQ-5D-5L) and healthcare economic impact will be recorded over 12 months after surgery. Complications (Clavien-Dindo) and pathology outcomes. 5-year survival and cancer recurrence will also be recorded as part of standard of care. Purposefully selected patients (n=30) representing different cancer types and from different geographical regions in the UK, ensuring the inclusion of different ethnic and under-represented minority backgrounds (ie, sexual and gender minorities and those from low socio-economic groups) will be interviewed at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. Patient experiences including preparedness, complex decision-making, complications, regret and hidden cancer treatment toxicities will be explored. ANALYSES: EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health scores at 12 months will be compared between groups (primary outcome: flap versus mesh reconstruction). Descriptive statistics, causal inference techniques and regression modelling will be used to account for allocation bias and heterogeneity. Propensity scoring will weight cases and causal inference techniques will be used to visualise and understand confounding effects. Cost-utility economic analyses will compare reconstructive techniques. Longitudinal interview analyses will use constant comparative methods using reflexive thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: REMACS is approved by HRA REC (22/NE/0032). The study is funded by Penguins Against Cancer (Registered Charity Number 1159905), Bowel Research UK (BRUK SG 23019), PLANETS Cancer Charity (Registered Charity Number 1175572) and an NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Grant (NIHR207881).This study will benefit patients internationally by providing real-world outcomes to improve shared decision-making around complex consultations, informing patient expectations and clinical outcomes for QoL, complications and cost after EMCS and perineal reconstruction. Results will be disseminated to researchers, healthcare professionals, patients, carers, charities and policymakers through online platforms, media, scientific conferences and journals. This will raise awareness of late effects of cancer treatment, influence international guidelines and cancer commissioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials.gov registration number-NCT05219058 and ISRCTN registry number-ISRCTN81241096.

Indexed as

Pelvic NeoplasmsPerineumPlastic Surgery ProceduresQuality of LifeAgedColorectal Surgical ProceduresCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsUnited KingdomColorectal surgeryHEALTH ECONOMICSQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID42810789
PMCPMC13630098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.