ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026
Electronic Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life Trajectories in ICU Survivors: A Multicentre Pilot Study-Within-a-Trial Protocol.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient-important outcomes beyond mortality, particularly health-related quality of life (HRQoL), are frequently used in intensive care unit (ICU) trials. However, HRQoL assessment remains challenging due to methodological complexities, including poorly defined recovery trajectories, lack of consensus on measurement instruments, complexity of statistical analysis, and missing data. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may improve data collection and efficiency, though their feasibility in ICU survivors is uncertain.
methodsThis protocol outlines a longitudinal, multicentre pilot study-within-a-trial aimed at evaluating the feasibility of ePRO-based HRQoL follow-up and exploring a trajectory-based approach to HRQoL characterisation after critical illness. We plan to enrol 100 participants already undergoing 180-day HRQoL follow-up in the Intensive Care Platform Trial (INCEPT) to complete monthly EQ-5D-5L surveys delivered by text messages from 6 to 12 months after randomisation. Feasibility outcomes include enrolment and response rate, time to completion, reminder-dependency, attrition pattern, agreement between modes of collection, and accessibility. Agreement between telephone- and ePRO-based assessments at 180 days will be evaluated at the group and at the individual level. Longitudinal EQ-5D-5L index values and visual analogue scale trajectories will be analysed using area-under-the-curve methods based on linear interpolation. Scenario-based sensitivity analyses will assess the potential impact of unobserved mortality among dropouts. DISCUSSION: We hypothesise that ePRO-based repeated assessments of HRQoL will support the goal of optimised data collection methods, while ensuring resources control. Moreover, identification of a candidate approach to HRQoL characterisation may shed light into the full recovery trajectory of ICU survivors and improve the interpretation and clinical relevance of HRQoL outcome assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.