Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42810620›Full record

ArticleEndocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists2026

Comparative Weight-Loss Outcomes Following Initiation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Versus SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Real-World Active Comparator Study.

Valentin Milanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Valentin MilanovDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville, North Carolina. Electronic address: vmilanov@uncfsu.edu.

Funding

Enhancing All of Us Data Resources for Nutrition Precision Health: the All of Us Data and Research CenterU2COD023196 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GLAZER, DAVID, HARRIS, PAUL A. · 2016 to 2022
$143.7M
NIH HHS U2C OD023196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare 12-month weight loss between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) initiators and assess effect modification by diabetes status, sex, and race/ethnicity in a diverse US cohort.

methodsRetrospective active comparator new-user cohort study using the NIH All of Us Research Program (2018-2023). We identified 2932 SGLT2i-naïve GLP-1RA initiators and 941 GLP-1RA-naïve SGLT2i initiators aged 18 to 80 with body mass index ≥27 kg/m

resultsAfter inverse probability of treatment weighting, GLP-1RA initiators lost more weight than SGLT2i initiators (difference -1.20 pp [95% confidence interval [CI], -1.91 to -0.48]; P =.001; odds ratio 1.75 [95% CI, 1.40-2.19]; risk ratio 1.61 [95% CI, 1.19-2.03]; number needed to treat 14), concentrated in obesity-only patients (-1.96 pp; P < .001) but absent in type 2 diabetes (+0.08 pp; interaction P =.006). Sex modified the effect (P =.017): -1.71 pp in women vs +0.12 pp in men. HbA1c decreased more with GLP-1RA (-0.261%; P =.032); blood pressure did not differ significantly.

conclusionGLP-1RA initiators achieved greater weight loss than SGLT2i initiators, concentrated in women and patients without type 2 diabetes, supporting individualized treatment selection. Interaction findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective confirmation.

Indexed as

active comparatorGLP-1 receptor agonisthealth equitypharmacoepidemiologySGLT2 inhibitorweight loss

Identifiers

PMID42810620
PMCPMC13692698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.