ArticleApplied clinical informatics2026
Canadian Paramedic User Requirements for Speech Recognition-Aided Documentation.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract:
objectiveDeveloping technology may assist paramedics in the competing tasks of providing life-saving care and accurately documenting that care. The objective of this study was to identify and classify paramedic user requirements for speech recognition (SR)-aided documentation. Abstract:
methodsThis was a two-phase, mixed-methods study. Phase 1 involved a web-based questionnaire distributed to paramedics across Canada. Phase 2 consisted of opt-in one-on-one interviews to gain further insight into the survey results. Descriptive and associative statistics were used to identify which features respondents deemed most important, which were classified into five categories based on questionnaire results. Thematic content analysis of the qualitative data was used to understand the quantitative rankings. Abstract:
resultsA total of 323 respondents completed the questionnaire. Overall, 86% of respondents ( Abstract:
conclusionThese prioritized features highlight the unique practice context of paramedicine. While this was a Canadian study, the results may be applicable to other similar paramedicine practice systems. This work provides a robust list and classification of SR user requirements for Canadian paramedics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.