Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42810138›Full record

SynthesisEnvironment international2026

Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse health effects associated with mycotoxin exposure.

Tess Goessens, Yasmine Bader, Febe Vertriest, Kokeb Tesfamariam, Sarah De Saeger, Carl Lachat, Marthe De Boevre

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environment international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tess GoessensCentre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: tess.goessens@ugent.be.
Yasmine BaderCentre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Nutrition Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France.
Febe VertriestCentre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Kokeb TesfamariamCentre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Sarah De SaegerCentre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biotechnology and Food Technology, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 17011, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa.
Carl LachatDepartment of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Marthe De BoevreCentre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycotoxins, toxic fungal metabolites present in food, are an increasing global health concern expected to intensify with climate change and shifting dietary patterns.

aimThis review systematically identified, appraised, and synthesized primary research on human health effects associated with exposure to single and multiple mycotoxins, aiming to clarify current evidence, uncertainties, and research gaps.

methodsFollowing the PECO framework, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to May 2025 for studies reporting measured or modelled mycotoxin exposure and human health outcomes. Non-human, mechanistic, review, and grey literature were excluded. Three reviewers independently screened studies, with duplicate full-text assessment. Risk of bias was evaluated using OHAT and certainty of evidence with GRADE. Sensitivity analyses, publication bias assessment, and non-quantitative evidence were synthesized using Cochrane effect-direction plots. Random-effects meta-analyses assessed associations between aflatoxin exposure and seven health outcomes.

resultsOf 55,342 records, 268 studies met inclusion criteria, covering 17 mycotoxin groups and 71 health outcomes. Liver disease, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma, and kidney disease were the most frequently investigated outcomes, with most studies conducted in Africa and Asia. Qualitative synthesis demonstrated predominantly positive associations between mycotoxin exposure and neurological, metabolic, oncological, renal, reproductive, and developmental disorders. Certainty of evidence was very low for all 21 assessed outcomes, reflecting the predominance of cross-sectional designs and substantial between-study inconsistency. Quantitative meta-analyses of 42 studies identified associations between aflatoxin exposure and hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cirrhosis, elevated ALT, and gallbladder cancer.

conclusionEvidence supports associations between mycotoxin exposure and multiple health risks; however, heterogeneity in study design, exposure assessment, and outcome reporting highlights the need for more rigorous and harmonized research across diverse populations.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureMycotoxinsHumansMycotoxinsBiomarkersHuman health outcomesMycotoxinsSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.