ArticlePoultry science2026
Effect of intermittent thermal stimulation on hatchability and physicochemical properties of duck eggs.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent thermal stimulation during short-term egg storage (72 hours) on egg quality, hatching performance, hatching dynamics, duckling quality, and changes in the physicochemical properties of egg components during incubation. A total of 890 hatching eggs from Cherry Valley ducks were used. Following the assessment of egg quality before storage, the eggs were either stored at ≤15°C without thermal stimulation (N-TS) or subjected to two 8-h heating periods at 37.7°C and 55% relative humidity, separated by 8-h cooling periods at ≤15°C (TS). After storage, the eggs were incubated under standard conditions. Egg quality and egg weight loss were evaluated, whereas lysozyme activity, viscosity, pH, and mineral composition were determined before incubation and on d 7 and 14 of incubation. Eggs from the TS group had higher thick albumen height (P=0.018) and a higher albumen index (P=0.021), but a lower yolk index (P=0.041) and higher weight loss during storage (P<0.001) than eggs from the N-TS group. Hatchability of set eggs and fertile eggs, embryonic mortality, and Pasgar scores did not differ between the groups (P>0.05). However, thermal stimulation markedly accelerated the hatching process, as 72.24% of healthy ducklings in the TS group had hatched by 616 h of incubation, compared with only 10.41% in the N-TS group (P<0.001). Relative duckling weight was lower in the TS group (P=0.005). Thermal stimulation increased lysozyme activity in the amniotic fluid on d 14 of incubation (P=0.039). Transient differences in viscosity, pH, and the concentrations of selected mineral elements were also observed. These findings indicate that intermittent thermal stimulation during short-term storage modified the physicochemical environment of duck eggs and accelerated hatching, but did not improve final hatchability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.