Observational studyJMIR formative research2026
Factors Associated With Engagement When Using Social Media to Teach Physicians Point-of-Care Ultrasound During Off-Hours: Observational Study.
Observational study in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough social media is often viewed by residents and could be used to reinforce teaching points, there is little data on methods that improve engagement in learning medical topics while socially perusing this medium.
objectiveWe observed how the timing of posted questions, correctly answering questions, and providing supportive comments affected resident engagement with point-of-care ultrasound clips viewed electively on a private social media account.
methodsOf 60 medical residents, 35 followed an Instagram account that posted ultrasound video clips with questions during the academic year. Engagement was defined as the percentage of questions answered among the total number of clips viewed, calculated for each posted story (story engagement, E(s)) and each resident (resident engagement, E(r)). E(s) was tested for an association with (1) weekend vs weekday posts, (2) answering questions correctly vs incorrectly, and (3) supportive responses from faculty vs no feedback.
resultsOf 16 posts, 120 questions were answered from 428 clips viewed by 35 residents, resulting in an E(s) of 28% (range 15%-59%) across posts and a median E(r) of 19% (IQR 0%-39%) across residents; 71% (n=25) of residents engaged with at least 1 post. E(s) was higher during weekdays vs weekends (30% vs 21%; P=.007) and correlated to answering correctly vs incorrectly (r=0.6; P<.001). A supportive comment resulted in a lower percentage of answering the next post, compared to no feedback (30% vs 71%; P=.02).
conclusionsSocial media engagement was higher when questions were answered correctly but, surprisingly, lower when posts were made on weekends and immediately after receiving a supportive comment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.