Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809845›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026

Detecting Misspelled Drug Names Using Transformer-Based Language Models: Model Development and External Validation.

Jiayu Lu, Kevin W McConeghy, Andrew R Zullo, Jinying Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiayu LuDepartment of Medicine/Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1617-7267
Kevin W McConeghyDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-0431
Andrew R ZulloDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1673-4570
Jinying ChenDepartment of Medicine/Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7259-4301

Funding

Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Vincent Mor · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
NIA NIH HHS U54 AG063546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMisspellings in medication names can compromise patient safety, reduce data utility, and impede large-scale data initiatives that integrate medication information from electronic health records (EHRs). Existing methods for detecting misspelled medical terms are mostly dictionary-based and can lead to high false-positive rates when correctly spelled but previously unseen (out-of-vocabulary) terms are encountered.

objectiveWe aimed to develop and validate domain-specific, transformer-based language models for detecting misspelled drug names, with an emphasis on performance for unseen terms.

methodsUsing RxNorm as a standardized drug vocabulary, we created an RxNorm-augmented training corpus and developed two BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers)-based models-BERTDrug and CharBERTDrug-for misspelling detection. Specifically, we randomly split 69,824 RxNorm drug names into training, development, and test sets (3:1:1) and generated k misspellings per name using text-perturbation techniques (k optimized for training; fixed at 1 for development and test sets). The models were fine-tuned on the training and development sets and evaluated using the RxNorm test set and 3586 drug names from the Long-Term Care Data Cooperative (LTCDC) database (external validation). The RxNorm test set and out-of-vocabulary LTCDC dataset (1922 terms), neither overlapping with the RxNorm training data, were used to evaluate performance on unseen terms. SpellChecker served as a dictionary-based baseline, while fastText

resultsOn the RxNorm test set, BERTDrug and CharBERTDrug outperformed the baseline models across most metrics. BERTDrug achieved the best overall performance (F

conclusionsDomain-specific language models improved detection of misspellings in out-of-vocabulary drug names and outperformed baseline models in both internal and external evaluations. The comparison with a generative LLM suggests that domain shift may substantially reduce the advantages conferred by domain-specific training. With further fine-tuning on diverse data that capture the terminology, formatting conventions, and spelling patterns encountered across real-world clinical settings, these models could be adapted for use in other clinical databases and EHR systems to improve medication data quality for research and to support future safety-focused applications.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingElectronic Health RecordsHumansLarge Language ModelsRxNormclinical repositoriesdata augmentation using RxNormlarge language modelsmedication namesmisspelling detectiontransformer-based language models

Identifiers

PMID42809845
PMCPMC13662438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.