Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809841›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026

A Multi-Model, Pixel-Native Framework for Automated Computed Tomography Series Labeling and Characterization: Proof-of-Concept Study.

Yutong Wen, Anton Sheahan Quinsten, Cynthia Sabrina Schmidt, Christian Bojahr, Judith Kohnke, Kamyar Arzideh, Sina Warmer, Sebastian Blex, Ann-Christin Jacoby, Max Eberts and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Yutong WenData Integration Center, Central IT Department, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8557-6665
Anton Sheahan QuinstenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8168-8406
Cynthia Sabrina SchmidtInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-0687
Christian BojahrInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9635-4795
Judith KohnkeInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8826-3481
Kamyar ArzidehData Integration Center, Central IT Department, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6074-804X
Sina WarmerInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2262-2655
Sebastian BlexInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3474-897X
Ann-Christin JacobyInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9900-4843
Max EbertsInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5747-5316
Hanna LehmannInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4350-2735
Olivia Barbara PollokInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0038-3986
Mathias HoltkampInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-2207
Luca SalhöferInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5376-3154
Lale UmutluInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5215-7171
Michael ForstingInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5584-9824
Johannes HauboldInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4843-5911
Felix NensaInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-7100
Katarzyna BorysInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6987-6041
René HoschInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1760-2342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) metadata are widely used to manage medical imaging data and support clinical workflows, their suitability as a sole basis for automatic computed tomography (CT) series labeling and characterization is limited. DICOM metadata are frequently inconsistently populated, institution specific, use unregulated private tags, and have variable reliability even within standardized fields. Consequently, automated series selection for downstream AI applications often remains unreliable, necessitating manual curation within clinical workflows.

objectiveThis study presents Orchestrate, a modular AI framework for automated orchestration of CT imaging data. By integrating a hierarchy of deep learning models, Orchestrate enables pixel-level classification and routing of CT series and accurate metadata-independent identification of anatomical regions, contrast-enhanced series, and reconstruction kernels, supporting seamless downstream AI integration without manual curation.

methodsOrchestrate combined 3 pretrained models for anatomical regions, landmarks, and body part classification and 4 newly developed You Only Look Once (YOLO) v8-based models to classify contrast enhancement, recognize reconstruction kernels, and infer laterality. Three datasets were used: an internal development dataset comprising 27,418 CT studies for individual model development, an internal framework evaluation dataset comprising 200 CT studies to assess the complete framework under a simulated real-world scenario, and an external dataset from The Cancer Imaging Archive comprising 100 CT studies. For the internal development data, reference standards were derived from complete and unambiguous DICOM metadata following institutional definitions. For the 2 evaluation datasets, 3 radiographers independently established reference standards as DICOM metadata were not assumed to be complete or consistent. Clinical utility was assessed through cohort selection tasks involving 3 predefined target cases, with 3 radiologists reviewing selection accuracy. The interrater agreement was assessed using the Fleiss κ. The model performance was evaluated using F

resultsDICOM metadata were incomplete in the internal framework evaluation dataset and external dataset, with missing rates of 42.9% (413/963) and 92.9% (105/113) for contrast enhancement, respectively, and a missing reconstruction kernel information rate of 0.4% (4/963) in the internal framework evaluation dataset. During model development, individual models achieved macro-F

conclusionsOrchestrate enables automated pixel-based classification, detection, and semantic description of CT series, reducing reliance on manual selection and the risk of inconsistent metadata. By generating standardized semantic content, the framework provides a proof of concept for improving interoperability with clinical systems and supports the reliable, reproducible integration of AI-driven imaging pipelines into clinical workflows.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep LearningHumansProof of Concept StudyReproducibility of ResultsAIAI orchestrationanatomical region detectionartificial intelligencecomputed tomographydeep learningDICOM-free classificationDigital Imaging and Communications in Medicine–free classificationhealth information interoperabilityradiology workflowreconstruction kernel

Identifiers

PMID42809841
PMCPMC13662436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.