ArticleOnline journal of public health informatics2026
Using Immunization Data Systems to Track Zero-Dose Children in Bangladesh: Mixed Methods Exploratory Study.
Article in Online journal of public health informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundZero-dose (ZD) children-those who receive no routine vaccines-remain highly vulnerable, with global evidence showing that they are concentrated in marginalized and hard-to-reach settings. In Bangladesh, stagnant full-immunization coverage, population mobility, and inconsistencies in administrative data complicate accurate estimation of ZD and underimmunized children. Gaps in the completeness, timeliness, and accuracy of routine Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) information systems further limit the ability to identify and target these populations.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the completeness, timeliness, and accuracy of Bangladesh's immunization data systems and to identify challenges and strategies for integrating ZD analysis into routine EPI information systems.
methodsWe used a mixed methods exploratory descriptive qualitative approach comprising a desk review and stakeholder interviews conducted from February 2024 to April 2024. The desk review assessed program documents, gray literature, and published studies to map routine immunization data sources and their relevance for ZD analysis. Thirteen purposively selected stakeholders, including EPI and District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2) managers, were interviewed using semistructured interview guides to gather insights on data availability, reporting practices, and system challenges. Information from both steps was synthesized using a structured checklist to evaluate completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and feasibility of ZD tracking across data sources. Data were analyzed manually using a deductive thematic approach.
resultsTen routine immunization data sources were identified, with DHIS2, the Rapid Convenience Monitoring (RCM) tool, and the EPI Coverage Evaluation Survey (CES) emerging as the primary systems for ZD tracking. Although most sources captured child-level data, the use of unique identifiers and household-level variables was inconsistent. Data quality and timeliness varied: DHIS2 faced denominator inaccuracies, CES and Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) provided high-quality survey estimates, and RCM delivered real-time data from hard-to-reach areas. Multiple systems supported ZD identification, although each had limitations related to data completeness, sampling, geographic granularity, or operational constraints.
conclusionsImmunization data systems in Bangladesh are fragmented, with limited ZD tracking and predominantly district-level reporting. DHIS2, RCM, and Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) are the most promising platforms for routine ZD monitoring, offering nationwide integration, real-time field data, and detailed local analysis. Harmonizing these systems and combining data from multiple sources can improve targeted interventions, subnational monitoring, and equitable vaccine coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.