Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809814›Full record

SynthesisObstetrics and gynecology2026

Doula Support During Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Postpartum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Meera Viswanathan, Jennifer Cook Middleton, Nila A Sathe, Shivani Reddy, LaToshia Rouse, Jessica Vaughan, Shaunette Howard, Rachel Peragallo Urrutia

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meera ViswanathanRTI International, Research Triangle Park, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, Birth Sisters Doula Services, Knightdale, and Kiota Doula, Zebulon, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3486-8126
Jennifer Cook Middleton
Nila A Sathe
Shivani Reddy
LaToshia Rouse
Jessica Vaughan
Shaunette Howard
Rachel Peragallo Urrutia

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute contract number Task Order #05, RSNT IDIQ TORFP # PCO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the evidence on doula support in pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Library (which includes clinical trials), CINAHL, PsycInfo. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) based in the United States that evaluated doula support compared with standard care. Included studies reported maternal, infant, and partner outcomes from database inception through November 18, 2025. We used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to assess the certainty of evidence. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND

resultsTwelve RCTs and 18 NRSIs reported on doula support compared with standard maternity care. One study had low risk of bias (ROB) (one RCT), 10 had moderate ROB (three RCTs, seven NRSIs), and 19 had high ROB (eight RCTs, 11 NRSIs). Doula support is likely to be associated with lower rates of preterm birth and cesarean delivery, improved birth experiences, and increased likelihood of postpartum visit attendance (moderate certainty of evidence). Doula support may be associated with improved prenatal mood, spontaneous vaginal birth, vaginal birth after cesarean, initiation of breastfeeding, childbirth education attendance, respectful care, satisfaction with care, self-efficacy, parenting confidence, postpartum adjustment to parenthood, and reduced epidural anesthesia use, length of labor, and infant mortality (low certainty of evidence). It may not be associated with reduced rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, maternal readmissions, and neonatal intensive care admissions (low certainty of evidence). Among studies composed entirely of people at risk of disparities (specifically, those arising from race, carceral settings, low income, and having public insurance), four of five reported at least some benefit associated with doula support. There was insufficient information available on the effects of varying intensity or types of doula support. Heterogeneity was noted across many outcomes.

conclusionResearch suggests that doula support is associated with some improved maternal outcomes, although many studies were heterogeneous and rated as having high ROB. Research on type (including independent doulas), intensity, and timing of doula support could help to clarify settings in which doula care improves maternal and child outcomes and reduces health disparities. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P795C.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricDoulasParturitionPostnatal CarePrenatal CareFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42809814
PMCPMC13574363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.