ArticleNeurology2026
Disease Progression in Iatrogenic Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.
Article in Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesIatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy (iCAA), likely caused by transmission of amyloid-beta by medical procedures, is a rare but distinct cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) subtype, with rising numbers of patients identified globally. However, given its relatively recent recognition, data on long-term outcomes and prognosis are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical disease progression in patients diagnosed with iCAA.
methodsAfter a systematic literature search for larger case series of iCAA (n ≥ 5), we included patients from 4 European countries (Austria, Italy, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom) meeting modified Queen Square criteria for possible or probable iCAA. Clinical outcomes of interest were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH), cognitive status at last follow-up, and mortality. We used Cox regression to investigate clinical variables associated with those outcome events.
resultsWe included 82 patients (59.8% male, median age at presentation 50 years, median latency from exposure 39 years); 50% of patients initially presented with ICH and 32.9% with cSAH/transient focal neurologic episodes. During a median follow-up time of 3.8 years (IQR 1.8-5.9; total follow-up 385 patient-years), 74 symptomatic ICH occurred, corresponding to a rate of 19.2 per 100 patient-years after first presentation. Patients who initially presented with ICH had an increased rate of recurrent ICH compared with other presentations (hazard ratio 3.14, 95% CI 1.55-6.33, DISCUSSION: Following a long latency from presumed exposure, patients diagnosed with iCAA have a high rate of subsequent symptomatic ICH (∼20% yearly risk), with recurrence risk being the highest among patients initially presenting with ICH and those exposed by brain rather than spinal surgery. The mortality rate was low despite the high frequency of ICH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42809801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.