Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809777›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Eye Tracking-Based Evaluation of Auditory Spatial Attention in a Virtual Auditory Environment: Protocol for Development of a New Approach and Preliminary Validation.

Clémence Lelaumier, Franck Doidy, Baptiste Fruleux, Antoine Petroff, Valentin Bauer, Hervé Platel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Franck Doidy *Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm, EPHE-PSL, PSL University Paris, CHU de Caen, GIP Cyceron, U1077, NIMH, 2, Rue des Rochambelles, Caen, F-14032, France, 33(0)231568379.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8274-9383
Baptiste FruleuxWivy, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4811-8809
Antoine PetroffCosmos acoustique, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4456-716X
Valentin BauerSciences et Technologies de la Musique et du Son (STMS Lab), IRCAM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Ministère de la Culture, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-7507
Hervé PlatelUniversité de Caen Normandie, Inserm, EPHE-PSL, PSL University Paris, CHU de Caen, GIP Cyceron, U1077, NIMH, 2, Rue des Rochambelles, Caen, F-14032, France, 33(0)231568379.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-0398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Auditory spatial attention (ASA) can be impaired in clinical populations and affects everyday activities, yet it remains understudied and lacks practical assessment tools for clinical use. However, recent technological advances have enabled the development of auditory virtual environments capable of engaging attentional networks while remaining compatible with clinical implementation and supporting the collection of objective physiological measures. Objective: This study aimed to address the lack of clinically applicable ASA assessments by developing a new assessment (phase 1) and supporting its future implementation in clinical practice through preliminary validation and user experience evaluation (phase 2). Methods: In phase 1, the assessment was developed through a multidisciplinary research committee involving clinicians and researchers, and was refined through pilot testing with 17 healthy participants. It uses an immersive auditory virtual environment and combines eye tracking, head tracking, and pupillometry. Phase 2 will consist of two successive studies: (1) 15 expert clinicians (neuropsychologists or speech therapists) will evaluate face and content validity, and user experience, and (2) 80 healthy adults will provide additional sources of validity evidence and user experience data. Participants will complete 5 steps of an ASA task, alternating habituation and measurement blocks, using either gaze orientation or head orientation as the response modality. Vocal targets will be presented with or without background sound in a dynamic binaural environment. Results: Study 1 will provide preliminary validity evidence based on face and content, together with user experience outcomes, including usability, satisfaction, and intention to use. Recruitment of participants began in November 2025 and was completed in January 2026. Data analysis is in progress, and the corresponding manuscript is expected to be submitted for publication during the winter of 2026-2027. Study 2 will provide preliminary validity evidence based on precision, face and content, response processes, internal structure, and fairness, together with user experience outcomes, including usability, satisfaction, and sense of presence. Recruitment of participants began in March 2026 and is expected to be completed in October 2026. As of July 2026, 48 participants had been enrolled. Completion of data analysis and submission of the corresponding manuscript are expected in winter 2027-2028. Conclusions: This validation study represents the first step toward developing a clinically applicable tool for assessing ASA. By combining immersive auditory technology with clinically feasible hardware, the proposed approach aims to provide a rapid and ecologically valid evaluation of ASA. Future studies will focus on formal psychometric validation, patient testing, and the development of normative data.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionEye-Tracking TechnologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleVirtual RealityYoung Adultauditory spatial attentionauditory virtual realityhead trackingoculometrypupillometrysound localization task.

Identifiers

PMID42809777
PMCPMC13623210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.