ReviewCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)
CAR-T Cell Therapy: Engineering Remission in Refractory Myeloma.
Review in Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have rapidly reshaped the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM), progressing from an experimental salvage option to a therapy with a demonstrated overall survival advantage and durable, potentially curative remissions in a subset of patients. This review surveys the current evidence supporting their use, the biology underlying their successes and failures, established and emerging toxicities, and novel approaches that will define the field in the coming years. Approved products directed against B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) induce rapid and deep responses even in heavily pretreated patients, and long-term follow-up now suggests a meaningful fraction of patients achieve prolonged remission after a single infusion without maintenance therapy. These benefits are accompanied by distinctive toxicities that shape the risk-benefit calculus as therapy moves to earlier lines and even to treatment naïve patients. We discuss the determinants of response and relapse, as well as the mechanisms of antigen-positive and antigen-negative escape that next-generation approaches aim to overcome. These include novel antigen targets, multi-antigen and armored constructs, rapid manufacturing, and in vivo CAR generation, all with the goal of extending durable remissions to every patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.