Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809697›Full record

ReviewCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)

CAR-T Cell Therapy: Engineering Remission in Refractory Myeloma.

Adam S Sperling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adam S SperlingDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9369-4413

Funding

Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL KENNEY · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
The role of SRCAP in therapy related clonal hematopoiesisR01DK141535 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Adam Sperling · 2025 to 2026
$974k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK141535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have rapidly reshaped the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM), progressing from an experimental salvage option to a therapy with a demonstrated overall survival advantage and durable, potentially curative remissions in a subset of patients. This review surveys the current evidence supporting their use, the biology underlying their successes and failures, established and emerging toxicities, and novel approaches that will define the field in the coming years. Approved products directed against B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) induce rapid and deep responses even in heavily pretreated patients, and long-term follow-up now suggests a meaningful fraction of patients achieve prolonged remission after a single infusion without maintenance therapy. These benefits are accompanied by distinctive toxicities that shape the risk-benefit calculus as therapy moves to earlier lines and even to treatment naïve patients. We discuss the determinants of response and relapse, as well as the mechanisms of antigen-positive and antigen-negative escape that next-generation approaches aim to overcome. These include novel antigen targets, multi-antigen and armored constructs, rapid manufacturing, and in vivo CAR generation, all with the goal of extending durable remissions to every patient.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveMultiple MyelomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesHumansRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR-Tcell therapymultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID42809697
PMCPMC13600359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.