Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
High-dose rifampicin and clarithromycin for 4 weeks versus standard-dose rifampicin and clarithromycin for 8 weeks to treat Buruli ulcer: An open-label, individually randomized, controlled trial in Ghana.
Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current 8-week regimen of rifampicin and clarithromycin for Buruli ulcer (BU) is suboptimal. High-dose rifampicin could shorten treatment and improve outcomes. We evaluated whether a 4-week high-dose regimen could improve time to clearance of viable Mycobacterium ulcerans. METHODOLOGY: In this open-label, individually randomised trial conducted in Ghana, participants with PCR-confirmed BU were assigned (1:1) to either high-dose oral rifampicin (20mg/kg) with clarithromycin (15mg/kg) for 4 weeks (HR) or standard-dose rifampicin (10mg/kg) with clarithromycin (15mg/kg) for 8 weeks (SR). All wounds were dressed with DACC-coated dressings. The primary outcome was time to clearance of viable M. ulcerans assessed by 16S rRNA qPCR up to week 20.
findingsBetween 26th November 2021 and 31st July 2024, 42 participants were randomised (HR:23, SR:19), which was short of the target (n = 112). The mean time to clearance was 4.9 weeks (SE 1.4) in the HR arm versus 7.0 weeks (SE 1.9) in the SR arm, with an adjusted mean difference of -0.5 weeks (95%CI -5.0 to 4.1, p = 0.835). No recurrences occurred in either arm. Paradoxical reactions were observed in 0/21 participants in the HR arm vs. 5/15 in the SR arm (adjusted OR 0.19, 95%CI 0.00-1.35, p = 0.102). Secondary infection rates were similar between groups.
conclusionHigh‑dose rifampicin combination for 4 weeks was well tolerated in this population. A nominally lower proportion of paradoxical reactions was observed in the high-dose rifampicin arm compared with standard therapy. The trial did not find evidence of significantly shorter time to microbiological clearance or healing compared with standard therapy. Larger trials are needed to determine efficacy and safety.
trial registrationPan African Clinical Trials Repository, trial registration number: PACTR202011867644311 (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=14534).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.