ArticlePloS one2026
Rising performance-efficiency demands in female junior tennis: A longitudinal analysis of ITF World Tennis Tour Juniors rankings, 2004-2025.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term changes in ranking-point production efficiency among female players on the ITF World Tennis Tour Juniors were examined between 2004 and 2025. Year-end ranking data comprised 8,510 player-year observations from 5,919 players aged 12-18 years. Elite status was defined annually using a two-stage data-driven knee-point procedure: players were ordered according to Total Ranking Points (TRP), the knee percentile was identified from the smoothed Total Singles Points profile across this TRP-based ordering, and the threshold was applied to the same percentile scale. Performance efficiency was assessed using Singles PPE, Doubles PPE, and Total PPE, with Total PPE defined as TRP divided by total competitive event exposure. In pooled descriptives excluding 2020-2021, median Singles PPE was 64.62 in elite versus 26.56 in non-elite players; corresponding values were 48.57 versus 29.00 for Doubles PPE and 40.38 versus 17.71 for Total PPE. Positive Year × elite-status interactions were identified in linear player-year models adjusted for age, discipline-specific competitive event exposure, COVID-disrupted seasons, and repeated player observations, corresponding to additional average annual increases of 10.81%, 8.97%, and 9.25%, respectively. However, non-COVID natural-spline models showed that temporal differentiation was non-linear and did not support uniform monotonic widening across 2004-2025. In lagged sensitivity analyses, prior-year elite status was associated with higher subsequent PPE, but Year × prior-year elite-status interactions were not significant in the strict non-COVID specification. Forecasts based on 20 non-COVID annual elite medians projected higher PPE through 2030 under continuation of the observed linear trend, while event-exposure scenarios indicated fewer competitive event exposures associated with fixed TRP benchmarks at higher projected efficiency. These projections should be interpreted as conditional ranking-system scenarios rather than measures of physiological load or individual participation requirements. Overall, structurally defined elite players were characterised by persistently higher ranking-point production efficiency and significantly different, non-linear historical trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.