Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809554›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

A compartmentalized SCN model explains temperature resistance through interregional phase differences.

Feng Yu, Ling Yang, Jie Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Feng YuSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Ling YangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jie YanSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7030-0138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temperature cycles entrain circadian rhythms in many peripheral tissues, yet the master circadian pacemaker (suprachiasmatic nucleus) in mammals remains largely insensitive to the same input. Despite their similar molecular circuitry, the mechanisms underlying the distinct temperature responses of central and peripheral clocks remain unclear. To address this, we developed a compartmentalized model of the SCN circadian clock that integrates the heat shock protein (HSP) pathway, simulating the response of the SCN network to temperature variations. Using this model, we successfully recapitulated key experimental observations, including the ability of heat stimuli to entrain peripheral clocks to an inverted phase while the SCN maintains its resistance. Further analysis reveals that intrinsic phase heterogeneity among SCN subregions underlies this entrainment resistance. Specifically, the phase difference between the dorsal and ventral SCN leads to divergent phase responses upon simultaneous stimulation, resulting in an attenuated net shift of the overall SCN phase. Moreover, the mode of thermal input, in which the dorsal and ventral regions are stimulated concurrently, may further enhance the SCN's robustness to temperature entrainment. These results suggest that the SCN's resistance to temperature entrainment may differ mechanistically from photic entrainment, and highlight the potential importance of its spatial structure in maintaining circadian stability.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksCircadian RhythmModels, NeurologicalSuprachiasmatic NucleusAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHeat-Shock ProteinsTemperatureHeat-Shock Proteins

Identifiers

PMID42809554
PMCPMC13645230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.