ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Disparities in treatment burden in Peru among people with multiple long-term conditions by geography and healthcare facility: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) in low-resource settings face high treatment burdens, influenced by healthcare access and quality disparities. The study aimed to compare the treatment burden among patients with MLTC across geographical locations and healthcare providers in Peru. We conducted a cross-sectional study conducted between June-October 2023 among outpatients aged ≥40 years with type 2 diabetes and ≥1 additional chronic condition, recruited from public and private healthcare facilities in urban Lima and semi-urban Tumbes, Peru. Treatment burden was assessed using the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ). Differences in median MTBQ scores by setting and healthcare provider were analyzed using regression models adjusting for capacity- and workload-related variables. Among 555 participants (55% female, mean age 62.4 ± 10.5 years), median MTBQ score was 27.1 (IQR 14.6-41.7). After adjustment, patients in semi-urban Tumbes had higher treatment burden than those in urban Lima (adjusted median difference 6.1 points; 95% CI 2.9 to 9.3), while patients receiving care in private facilities had lower treatment burden than those in public settings (-6.6 points; 95% CI -9.3 to -3.9). These findings highlight substantial inequalities in treatment burden by place and provider type, with implications for efforts to improve care delivery and reduce disparities for people living with MLTC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.