ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026
Iatrogenic Large Bowel Perforation Following Image-Guided Pericardiocentesis: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Image-guided pericardiocentesis is a diagnostic and potentially life-saving intervention, yet even under guidance, rare complications can occur. Among them, bowel perforation with subsequent fecal pericarditis is an exceptionally uncommon and often under-recognized occurrence. CASE REPORT We describe the case of a 72-year-old man with multiple comorbidities, including acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie syndrome), Parkinson disease, and chronic kidney disease, who underwent urgent fluoroscopy-guided pericardiocentesis for a large pericardial effusion. After the procedure, his drain ceased to release any fluid, and he experienced progressive tachycardia. Imaging revealed that the catheter inadvertently penetrated the transverse colon, resulting in pneumoperitoneum and pneumopericardium. He required combined thoracic and abdominal surgery, including a pericardial window, controlled drain removal, primary colonic repair, and diverting colostomy. His recovery was uneventful, and he was discharged in stable condition. CONCLUSIONS Only a handful of similar cases are reported in the literature. Our case presents additional evidence that image-guided pericardiocentesis may be associated with an increased risk of iatrogenic bowel injury in patients with abdominal distension or colonic dysmotility. The patient was treated surgically for pericardial drainage and repair of colonic perforation, further addressing the patient's dysmotility at the time of surgery with the creation of a diverting colostomy. Awareness of unusual drain behavior and early imaging can expedite recognition and management of this life-threatening complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.