ArticleNursing in critical care2026
Nurses' Perspectives on a Communication Model Between Providers and Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunication with mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care is complex. Decades of research demonstrate that communication barriers are commonly experienced and one of the most challenging experiences during an intensive care stay. Support for the health care providers in these situations could be a model for communication, guiding the interaction.
aimThe aim of this study was to examine critical care nurses' (CCNs') perspectives of the clinical relevance and applicability of a communication model for mechanically ventilated patients. STUDY
designQualitative, explorative design in accordance with Im & Meleis' phases of development of situation-specific theories. We conducted six focus group interviews with CCNs from Denmark, Norway and the United States, two in each country, lasting between 58 and 90 min. The interviews were analysed by a content analytic approach with both inductive and deductive phases.
findingsTwenty-nine CCNs participated in the focus group interviews. The main category was identified during the analysis, which was: 'Relationship-building as a starting point for meaningful communication'. The main category was further described by three subcategories: (1) Patients' abilities and challenges in communication while being mechanically ventilated. (2) Nurses' competencies and strategies for effective communication with mechanically ventilated patients and (3) Tools and resources in practice.
conclusionsThe nurses' perspectives yielded a deeper understanding of how clinical practice both corresponds to and departs from a theoretical lens. Given that the interviews with nurses revealed the relational component as a critical starting point of communication, the model should highlight this specific element more explicitly. To understand the complexity occurring in the daily practice of an ICU, a situation-specific theory will be useful for providing examples of good practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Communication in an ICU setting requires the establishment of a relationship to find effective ways to communicate. Integrating clinical perspectives can refine and adapt the preliminary model to the real communication encounters and improve care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.