Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809202›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026

The Diabetes Complications in Senior Adults (DCSA) Study: A Scoping Review and a National Case Analysis from Northern Ireland, UK on Ocular Complications in Adults Aged 80 and over Living with Diabetes.

Laura N Cushley, Katie Curran, Basil Saju, Josh Kamalarajah, Max Kamalarajah, Alan Sproule, Soma Lengyel, Tunde Peto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura N CushleyCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. l.cushley@qub.ac.uk.
Katie CurranCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-109X
Basil SajuSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Josh KamalarajahSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Max KamalarajahSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Alan SprouleCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Soma LengyelPeninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Tunde PetoCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6265-0381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of people 80 years and over with a diagnosis of diabetes is increasing. This is due to people with type 1 diabetes living longer, successful diabetes management and a growing aging population. Due to this increase, there is limited understanding of the impact of diabetes in people 80 years or over, especially in relation to diabetic retinal disease (DRD) and other ocular complications. METHODOLOGY: A scoping review was conducted using PRISMA-ScR guidelines, with two reviewers independently screening abstracts and full texts. Case study data were obtained from the Northern Ireland Diabetic Eye Screening Programme. Database searches identified 1644 references, of which seven studies met the inclusion criteria following review. Across these, 29,734 participants were included, with 14,920 (50%) aged 80 years and over. The reported prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic maculopathy (DM) varied considerably across studies, ranging from 0.8% in Australia to 9.5% and 11.6% in Thailand and Suriname, respectively. This substantial variation may be attributable to differences in participant characteristics, study populations, geographical and regional settings, diagnostic and grading criteria for DR and DM and other methodological factors. Some studies reported the incidence of DRD in people 80 years and over was higher in those with a longer duration of diabetes. However, none have provided a comprehensive understanding of the burden of both diabetes-related and other ocular diseases within this older patient cohort. This case study found that approximately 20% of individuals aged 80 years and over had a diagnosis of diabetes. Although the proportion with proliferative, sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy was small (0.6%), this rate is comparable to the general population of people with diabetes.

conclusionFew studies have examined DRD in people 80 years and over. This case study aligns with the limited available evidence and highlights the continued importance of screening in this population.

Indexed as

DiabetesDiabetic retinal diseaseElderlyOver 80s

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.