Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809200›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2026

Beyond Fluid Responsiveness: Why Venous Congestion Matters in Sepsis.

Matteo Guarino, Michela Cascio, Francesco Luppi, Michele Domenico Spampinato, Roberto De Giorgio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo GuarinoDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. grnmtt@unife.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-8555
Michela CascioEmergency Department, "M. Bufalini" Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy.
Francesco LuppiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Michele Domenico SpampinatoDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Roberto De GiorgioDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis resuscitation has traditionally been guided by a flow-centered approach aimed at restoring arterial perfusion, often leading to standardized fluid administration strategies. However, recent evidence and international guidelines increasingly support individualized fluid therapy based not only on fluid responsiveness but also on fluid tolerance. Despite this paradigm shift, the venous side of the circulation remains largely under-recognized in bedside hemodynamic assessment. Organ perfusion depends not only on arterial inflow but also on effective venous drainage, and elevated venous pressure may impair tissue perfusion and contribute to organ dysfunction even in the presence of apparently adequate systemic hemodynamics. In septic patients, capillary leakage, myocardial dysfunction, vasoplegia, and altered venous compliance may create heterogeneous hemodynamic profiles in which fluid responsiveness and venous congestion can coexist. Consequently, fluid administration may transiently improve cardiac output while simultaneously worsening tissue edema and venous congestion. Emerging ultrasound-based tools, such as the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) score, aim to integrate venous assessment into resuscitation strategies, although their role in sepsis remains incompletely defined. Recognizing fluid tolerance as a complementary component of hemodynamic evaluation may help avoid one of the most common pitfalls of sepsis resuscitation: improving flow at the expense of congestion.

Indexed as

Haemodynamic managementSepsisSeptic shockVenous congestionVExUS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.