ReviewJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Indigenous Cancer Survivors in Peer Education and Community Knowledge Exchange: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indigenous people affected by cancer often encounter services that do not reflect their languages, relationships, knowledge systems, or community priorities. Survivor narratives are used in cancer education, yet the educational work undertaken by survivors has not been mapped. This scoping review examined the roles, formats, reported outcomes, and conditions shaping implementation when Indigenous cancer survivors participated in peer education and community knowledge exchange. Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and the reporting guideline for scoping reviews, six databases were searched from inception through July 2026. Twenty-one reports published between 2005 and 2026 were included. Survivor knowledge moved in three overlapping directions: between survivors through reciprocal support, outward to communities through education and storytelling, and toward organizations through co-design, navigation, advocacy, and service learning. Survivors served as peer educators, storytellers, advisors, advocates, resource co-creators, and knowledge stewards. Their activities produced peer sessions, performances, videos, digital stories, service priorities, navigation guidance, and community archives. Program evaluations reported cancer learning, greater comfort discussing cancer, reduced treatment anxiety, increased confidence sharing information, information seeking, and higher screening intention. Other reports described feeling less alone, healing and affirmation, culturally safer engagement, community-defined priorities, and survivor or community control over the representation and circulation of stories. Resourcing survivor leadership may strengthen cancer education while protecting reciprocity, cultural authority, and community control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42809164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.