ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Poverty screening among paediatricians in the Netherlands: an exploratory study of current practices.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children growing up in poverty are more likely to experience poorer health. Additionally, families experiencing poverty may be more likely to miss appointments or experience difficulties navigating support services. This highlights a potential role for paediatricians in identifying and addressing poverty, although their practices and perspectives are not well understood. Therefore, this study is aimed at gaining insight into current poverty screening, discussing and referral practices among paediatricians working in the Netherlands. This cross-sectional study distributed a digital survey in 2024 to assess current poverty-related practices among paediatricians in the Netherlands. The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys was followed in reporting on the study. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise multiple-choice responses. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis. Fifty paediatricians completed the survey. Most (92.0%) noticed that patients' financial concerns negatively affect access to healthcare. Paediatricians reported mixed practices regarding asking patients about financial circumstances and referring to supportive resources, highlighting that it is not part of standard paediatric practice. Various barriers played a role, including a lack of clear referral options, knowledge, identification tools, and conversation tools. Nevertheless, most paediatricians (84.0%) stated that they should play a role in identifying and discussing financial concerns or poverty among their patients. Conclusion: Although paediatricians recognise the importance of poverty for child health and are motivated to address it, they lack the resources for consistent practice. Future research should focus on developing and implementing targeted support strategies to strengthen paediatricians' capacity to address poverty-related challenges in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.