ArticlePediatric radiology2026
Methodological limitations of the BrainStructureAges pipeline from the volBrain platform: a brief report of the normative pediatric group.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicted brain age is a widely used neuroimaging biomarker of brain maturation. However, limited normative pediatric datasets in model training raise concerns about systematic biases when applied to children. This study evaluates the hypothesis of predicted brain age overestimation in typically developing pediatric populations.
objectiveTo analyze predicted brain age and brain delta in a large, age- and sex-matched sample of typically developing children and to test whether there is any potential systematic overestimation of predicted brain age in children using the BrainStructureAges pipeline (LaBRI, CNRS/University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe estimated predicted brain age from 105 brain MRI scans of healthy and typically developing children aged 6-9 years with well-documented medical histories. All scans were performed on a Magnetom Amira 1.5-T scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), using T1-weighted MPRAGE sequences. Brain age prediction utilized the BrainStructureAges pipeline on the volBrain (ITACA Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain, and LaBRI, CNRS/University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France) platform. The brain delta was defined as the difference between chronological age and predicted brain age. Regional estimates were obtained for 133 brain structures.
resultsThe mean predicted brain age was 9.3±1.2 years, compared to a chronological age of 7.7±0.4 years, resulting in a mean brain delta of 1.6±1.2 years. No significant sex differences were observed for chronological age, predicted brain age, or delta (boys, 1.55 years; girls, 1.61 years; t=0.27, P=0.79). Positive brain delta values were seen in 95.2% of participants across all structures, with the largest deviations in the left cerebellar exterior (+3.3 years), left occipital fusiform gyrus (+3.3 years), cerebellar lobules VI-VII (+2.9 years), left inferior occipital gyrus (+2.9 years), and right frontal pole (+2.8 years).
conclusionsThese findings suggest a systematic overestimation of predicted brain age in children, highlighting the need for caution in clinical interpretations to prevent misinterpretations in pediatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42809125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.