ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Standardized reporting of sacroiliac joints in spondyloarthritis on CT: modified Delphi consensus on lesion definitions from the ESSR-Arthritis Subcommittee.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo establish standardized definitions for structural sacroiliac joint (SIJ) lesions on computed tomography (CT) to enable consistent reporting. MATERIALS AND
methodsA modified Delphi process was conducted among members of the Arthritis Subcommittee of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR). Initial definitions were drafted by a core group of twelve experts from nine different countries, and iteratively refined across up to three rounds. In the first round, members indicated simple agreement or disagreement. Subsequent rounds employed a 10-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 10 = strongly agree), with a predefined threshold of > 75% agreement and a score of ≥ 8 required for a definition to advance. Explanatory texts and supporting references were introduced after the first round. Feedback was systematically reviewed, and consensus was sought on whether each definition should be retained or revised.
resultsResponse rates were 66% (42/64), 69% (44/64), and 75% (48/64) across the three rounds. Seven structural SIJ lesion definitions were established: erosions, pseudo-widening, subchondral sclerosis, backfill, SIJ space narrowing, bone bud, and ankylosis. Fat metaplasia was excluded by agreement due to limited CT detectability, while backfill, primarily visible on MRI, was retained as a structural lesion. Agreement across definitions ranged from 76% to 96%, with all exceeding predefined consensus thresholds.
conclusionsThis study provides the first expert consensus definitions for structural SIJ lesions on CT. Standardized definitions may improve reporting consistency, reproducibility, and communication among radiologists, and form the basis for a future CT-based SIJ-RADS scoring system to support earlier recognition of sacroiliitis. KEY POINTS: QuestionCan standardized expert consensus definitions for structural sacroiliac-joint lesions on CT be established to enable consistent reporting globally? FindingsThrough a modified Delphi process, experts achieved consensus on seven structural sacroiliac joint lesion definitions for CT with high agreement. Clinical relevanceStandardized CT definitions for sacroiliac joint lesions improve reporting consistency, interobserver reproducibility, and communication, enabling CT-based sacroiliac joint RADS and supporting earlier, confident recognition and stratification of sacroiliitis across institutions for patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42809116What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.