ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2026
Assessment of heart-to-contralateral lung ratios in virtual planar images derived from SPECT using
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA new AutoPlanar imaging technique can generate virtual planar images from SPECT data. We aimed to determine whether AutoPlanar images can provide accurate heart-to-contralateral lung ratio (H/CL) from
methodsThis retrospective study assessed 41 patients with suspected transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis using
resultsVisual assessment demonstrated good to excellent agreement, with exact agreement ranging from 73.2% to 97.6%. The H/CL ratios derived from AutoPlanar and planar images were highly correlated (r ≥ 0.97). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated small negative biases (- 0.087 to - 0.027); the 95% limits of agreement were - 0.130 to 0.051 for Flash3D+ with ACRR and - 0.123 to 0.061 for Flash3D+ with ACSCRR. Equivalence testing demonstrated statistical equivalence between planar and AutoPlanar H/CL ratios with ACRR and ACSCRR, whereas equivalence was not demonstrated with RR.
conclusionsThe H/CL ratios derived from AutoPlanar and planar images were comparable. AutoPlanar images were more strongly influenced by correction conditions than by the reconstruction method, with Flash3D+ using ACRR or ACSCRR showing favorable overall results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42809067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.