ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2026
Current Status of Animal Models for Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: Similarities to Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Applications.
Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPremature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a reproductive disorder characterized by the early loss of ovarian function before the age of 40, resulting in infertility and increasing the long-term risk of health issues such as osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and neuropsychological disorders. Although many studies have been conducted to understand POI pathophysiology and to develop regenerative therapies, the effectiveness of these therapies in restoring ovarian function remains limited. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the establishment of animal models of POI and assesses their similarity to clinical manifestations and therapeutic outcomes observed in human patients.
methodsPublished preclinical and clinical studies investigating POI animal models and regenerative therapies were comprehensively reviewed. Animal models were compared with human POI in terms of pathological features, endocrine changes, and therapeutic responsiveness. Evidence from studies of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapies, stem cell-derived extracellular vehicles (EVs), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and scaff old-assisted combination therapies was integrated.
resultsPOI models induced by chemotherapeutic agents, autoimmune mechanisms, or oxidative stress reproduce POI features, including follicular depletion, disrupted estrous cycles, and altered hormone profiles. However, they do not fully capture the systemic progression of the condition that is observed in human patients. We summarize emerging regenerative treatment strategies, including mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies, stem cell-derived exosome-like extracellular vesicles (EVs), platelet-rich plasma, and scaffold-assisted combination therapies, combining findings from both preclinical experiments and clinical studies. Comparing shared outcome markers, such as estradiol levels and follicle counts, while emphasizing age- and duration-of-amenorrhea differences in treatment response, is critical for assessing therapeutic efficacy, with younger patients and those with shorter disease duration showing more favorable responses.
conclusionsCurrent rodent models provide valuable insights but have limited ability to predict clinical efficacy. Further POI research should prioritize the development of more physiologically relevant models, such as non-human primates, which more closely resemble humans in both reproductive endocrinology and aging, omics approaches, and artificial intelligence (AI), which may significantly enhance the translational accuracy of POI research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42809064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.