SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Efficacy of transcranial alternating current stimulation on cognitive function in patients with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has shown potential for improving cognitive function in dementia, but evidence remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of tACS on cognitive function in dementia.
methodsWe searched seven databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing tACS effects on cognitive function in dementia. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed study quality. A random-effects model was used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). GRADE was used to rate evidence quality.
resultsA total of 9 RCTs involving 357 patients with dementia were included. Compared with sham stimulation, tACS significantly improved immediate global cognition (SMD = 0.28; 95% CI [0.01, 0.54]; p = 0.04, I² = 39%), but not at follow-up. tACS also significantly improved immediate recall, delayed recall, and associative memory. Additionally, tACS significantly enhanced cholinergic transmission as measured by short-latency afferent inhibition (MD = 0.34, p < 0.001, I² = 0%). However, no significant effect was observed for neuropsychiatric symptoms, and the evidence for executive function was inconclusive. No serious adverse events occurred.
conclusiontACS may improve immediate global cognition and memory in patients with dementia, but no significant benefit was observed at follow-up or for neuropsychiatric symptoms. Findings are limited by few studies, heterogeneous parameters, and insufficient follow-up data. Future large, well-designed RCTs with standardized protocols are needed to optimize tACS parameters and confirm sustained efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42809063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.