Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42809058›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anas R Alashram

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anas R AlashramDepartment of Physiotherapy, Middle East University, Airport Road, Amman, 11831, Jordan. anasalashram@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3066-3943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper limb impairments are among the most prevalent consequences of stroke. Recently, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and mirror therapy (MT) have been used in stroke rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to examine the effects of combining rTMS and MT on the upper limb in patients with stroke and define the optimal treatment parameters, if possible. "PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PEDro, EMBASE, REHABDATA, and Web of Science" were searched until March 2026. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of combined rTMS and MT on the upper limb poststroke were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and the GRADE were employed to evaluate risk of bias and certainty of evidence, respectively. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. Seven RCTs (402 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Significant improvements in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) (SMD = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.43-1.41, p = 0.0002) and the Box and Block Test (BBT) (SMD = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.49-1.68, p = 0.0003) were reported. Other outcomes demonstrated improvements in pinch grip, hand grip, functional performance, motor impairment, and muscle tone. The preliminary findings suggest that combining rTMS and MT has potential effects on enhancing upper limb function poststroke; however, these results should be interpreted with caution. The most effective treatment parameters remain unclear. Further high-quality studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Mirror Movement TherapyStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationUpper ExtremityCombined Modality TherapyHumansMirror therapyNoninvasive brain stimulationRehabilitationStrokeUpper limb

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.