ArticleLasers in medical science2026
Effects of photobiomodulation on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth cultured on electrospun polylactic acid microfibrous scaffolds.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHEDs) cultured on electrospun polylactic acid (PLA) microfibrous scaffolds. The scaffolds were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry. SHEDs were seeded onto the scaffold surface and assigned to three groups: nonirradiated control (C), L0.5 (0.5 J/cm²), and L1 (1.0 J/cm²). PBM was delivered with a 660 nm diode laser at 0 and 48 h after the initial irradiation time point. Cell metabolic activity was assessed at 24, 48, and 72 h using the Alamar Blue assay. Qualitative viable-cell distribution and cell-scaffold interactions were evaluated by Live/Dead staining and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. SHEDs remained viable on the PLA microfibrous scaffold and showed increasing metabolic activity over time. Compared with the control group, L1 presented higher Alamar Blue reduction values at 48 and 72 h, with the highest metabolic activity observed at 72 h. Live/Dead images showed qualitatively more extensive viable-cell colonization of the scaffold surface in the irradiated groups, without an apparent increase in dead-cell staining. Scanning electron microscopy revealed SHED adhesion to the microfibrous scaffold in all groups and qualitatively more extensive cell coverage after irradiation, particularly in L1. Electrospun PLA microfibrous scaffolds supported short-term SHED culture, and PBM at 1.0 J/cm² increased SHED metabolic activity and was associated with favorable qualitative cell-scaffold interactions. These findings provide preliminary support for PBM as an adjunctive biophysical strategy for improving early cellular responses in SHED-seeded electrospun PLA scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.