ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Machine learning and computational approaches to model therapeutic response and resistance in diffuse midline glioma.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDiffuse midline glioma (DMG) remains one of the most lethal cancers affecting children, adolescents and young adults and is near-universally resistant to treatment. Histone H3-alterations establish a profoundly dysregulated epigenetic landscape that promotes extensive intratumoral heterogeneity and cellular plasticity, key drivers of therapeutic resistance and treatment failure. Although single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics have transformed the study of tumor evolution, the mechanisms underpinning treatment resistance in DMG remain poorly understood. This Review examines how computational and machine learning-based approaches can be leveraged to study tumor adaptation under therapeutic pressure.
methodsWe provide an overview of computational frameworks developed for the analysis of single-cell and spatial transcriptomic datasets to model four major axes of tumor evolution: i) compositional shifts, ii) functional state remodeling, iii) tumor plasticity, and iv) intercellular communication; while highlighting how these approaches provided novel insights into DMG biology and the mechanisms underlying treatment adaptation.
resultsComputational and machine learning-based frameworks provide powerful tools for modeling the spatiotemporal dynamics of tumor evolution in high-dimensional transcriptomic data. Across the four dimensions examined, these approaches identify resistant cellular populations, characterize adaptive transcriptional programs, reconstitute cell-state transitions, and map tumor-microenvironment interactions, revealing mechanisms of therapeutic resistance and treatment adaptation.
conclusionComputational approaches developed to model tumor evolution under therapeutic pressure using single-cell and spatial transcriptomic data are rapidly advancing. As increasingly large and multimodal DMG datasets become available, the application of these approaches may help uncover resistance mechanisms, therapeutic vulnerabilities, and biomarkers that inform more precise and patient-specific treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.